relfreq: Interpretation of Relative Frequency Tables

Exercise template for assessing the interpretation of a table with relative frequencies where either total, row, or column frequencies are selected randomly.

Name:
relfreq
Type:
Preview:

In a small city the satisfaction with the local public transportation is evaluated. One question of interest is whether inhabitants of the city are more satisfied with public transportation compared to those living in the suburbs.

A survey with 250 respondents gave the following contingency table:

           Location
Evaluation  City Suburbs
  Very good   19      11
  Good        45      31
  Bad         25      66
  Very bad    11      42

The following table of percentages was constructed:

           Location
Evaluation  City    Suburbs
  Very good    19.0     7.3
  Good         45.0    20.7
  Bad          25.0    44.0
  Very bad     11.0    28.0

Which of the following statements are correct?

In the percentage table, the column sums are about 100 (except for possible rounding errors). Hence, the table provides column percentages, i.e., conditional relative frequencies for satisfaction level given location type.

  • True. This is the correct interpretation for column percentages.
  • False. The row sums are not equal to 100.
  • False. This calculation yields total percentages. But the table provides column percentages.
  • False. This is an interpretation for row percentages, but the table provides column percentages.
  • True. The column sums are equal to 100 (except for possible rounding errors).

In a small city the satisfaction with the local public transportation is evaluated. One question of interest is whether inhabitants of the city are more satisfied with public transportation compared to those living in the suburbs.

A survey with 250 respondents gave the following contingency table:

           Location
Evaluation  City Suburbs
  Very good   19      17
  Good        44      22
  Bad         27      60
  Very bad    10      51

The following table of percentages was constructed:

           Location
Evaluation  City    Suburbs
  Very good    19.0    11.3
  Good         44.0    14.7
  Bad          27.0    40.0
  Very bad     10.0    34.0

Which of the following statements are correct?

In the percentage table, the column sums are about 100 (except for possible rounding errors). Hence, the table provides column percentages, i.e., conditional relative frequencies for satisfaction level given location type.

  • True. This is the correct interpretation for column percentages.
  • False. This calculation yields row percentages. But the table provides column percentages.
  • True. This is the correct interpretation for column percentages.
  • True. The column sums are equal to 100 (except for possible rounding errors).
  • False. The row sums are not equal to 100.

In a small city the satisfaction with the local public transportation is evaluated. One question of interest is whether inhabitants of the city are more satisfied with public transportation compared to those living in the suburbs.

A survey with 250 respondents gave the following contingency table:

           Location
Evaluation  City Suburbs
  Very good   18      17
  Good        48      31
  Bad         24      67
  Very bad    10      35

The following table of percentages was constructed:

           Location
Evaluation  City    Suburbs
  Very good     7.2     6.8
  Good         19.2    12.4
  Bad           9.6    26.8
  Very bad      4.0    14.0

Which of the following statements are correct?

In the percentage table, the total sums are about 100 (except for possible rounding errors). Hence, the table provides total percentages, i.e., the relative frequencies for each combination of location type and satisfaction level.

  • False. The row sums are not equal to 100.
  • True. This is the correct interpretation for total percentages.
  • False. This is an interpretation for row percentages, but the table provides total percentages.
  • False. The column sums are not equal to 100.
  • False. This calculation yields row percentages. But the table provides total percentages.
Description:
A 4x2 table of relative frequencies needs to be interpreted by checking five multiple-choice items which all may either be true or false. Two tables are provided: the original absolute frequencies and one table of relative frequencies which randomly represents either total, or row, or column frequencies Each of the five items is also randomly selected from one of several possible variations.
Solution feedback:
Yes
Randomization:
Random numbers, text blocks, and R output
Mathematical notation:
No
Verbatim R input/output:
Yes
Images:
No
Other supplements:
No
Raw: (1 random version)
PDF:
relfreq-Rmd-pdf
relfreq-Rnw-pdf
HTML:
relfreq-Rmd-html
relfreq-Rnw-html

Demo code:

library("exams")

set.seed(403)
exams2html("relfreq.Rmd")
set.seed(403)
exams2pdf("relfreq.Rmd")

set.seed(403)
exams2html("relfreq.Rnw")
set.seed(403)
exams2pdf("relfreq.Rnw")